Post by messi05 on Jan 22, 2024 4:25:30 GMT
Pension worth one minimum wage to your daughter until she reaches the age of majority or completes higher education. According to the process, the baby died due to an error by the professionals who provided prenatal care, as they were unable to identify the presence of diabetes, the determining cause of the fetus' death. Shortly after the stillbirth, the mother was admitted to the ICU due to a hospital infection, dying four days later. The medical expert report pointed out that, if the diagnosis of diabetes had been made at the beginning of the pregnancy, the woman would not have been hospitalized and, consequently, would not have contracted the infection that killed her.
In its defense, the company claimed that there Buy Phone Number List was no error on the part of the professionals and that the deaths had occurred due to a normal complication during childbirth. Furthermore, he stated that civil liability would depend on the assessment of guilt of health professionals. The health plan's arguments, however, were refuted by judge Armando Pereira Junior, there is no need to specifically identify who was the professional who made a mistake, but only that one of the health professionals acted with guilt. "This is, as occurs in the public regime where a similar accountability regime is in force, the anonymous guilt of the service", he explains.
In this case, the judge considered that it would be impossible to identify the professional who made the mistake of not identifying diabetes, the cause of death, as she was monitored by different doctors throughout the pregnancy. "Because of this, there is only a need to identify guilt, even if the omitted doctor (anonymous) has not been identified, so that the defendant [health plan] can be held responsible for the fact of the service", he stated. The judge also rejected the argument that the deaths occurred due to normal complications of childbirth. He highlights that not even the expert was able to reach this conclusion due to lack of documents.
In its defense, the company claimed that there Buy Phone Number List was no error on the part of the professionals and that the deaths had occurred due to a normal complication during childbirth. Furthermore, he stated that civil liability would depend on the assessment of guilt of health professionals. The health plan's arguments, however, were refuted by judge Armando Pereira Junior, there is no need to specifically identify who was the professional who made a mistake, but only that one of the health professionals acted with guilt. "This is, as occurs in the public regime where a similar accountability regime is in force, the anonymous guilt of the service", he explains.
In this case, the judge considered that it would be impossible to identify the professional who made the mistake of not identifying diabetes, the cause of death, as she was monitored by different doctors throughout the pregnancy. "Because of this, there is only a need to identify guilt, even if the omitted doctor (anonymous) has not been identified, so that the defendant [health plan] can be held responsible for the fact of the service", he stated. The judge also rejected the argument that the deaths occurred due to normal complications of childbirth. He highlights that not even the expert was able to reach this conclusion due to lack of documents.
