Post by account_disabled on Dec 21, 2023 3:36:00 GMT
Putaclic , in French “click trap” refers to a fairly widespread bad practice with the development of blogs, content and sharing of articles and posts, particularly on LinkedIn (other social media are also affected). The principle, contrary to what some people think, is not to make a catchy or provocative title to attract people to its content. The putaclic is only when there is a lag between the promise implied by the title and the content. Very often these articles are hollow, without argument, without reflection. The definition of putaclic in Wikipedia is quite clear: “a headline that is sensational, even misleading, and based on sensational, emotional elements to the detriment of quality or accuracy .
So proposing a title and an illustrative image that will stand out or even attract people Email Data is not a putaclic... if the content is of quality. The shock of content We must not lie to ourselves: the gap is enormous and becomes abysmal between the quantity of content produced and the quantity of content consumed. Many contributors are read only by themselves. This is quite striking when you look closely at the page view stats of many websites. Sometimes there are fewer readers in 1 year than there are people on the team. But often this doesn't bother anyone. It is therefore necessary, if not vital, to use titles or even illustrations that provoke or at least challenge. If we want to be spotted and therefore read, we have no choice. Trying to keep the promise For my part, I try to combine shocking titles.
I don't care, I have a big one ) and quality content, that is to say thoughtful and argued. I can have fairly clear-cut positions. These are more convictions than certainties. I don't know if I'm right. But, all my points of view are considered and argued. I try to avoid shock formulas and without any attempt at demonstration. This also applies to my comments: I try just as much to avoid “that’s bad” as I do “great!”. So: Facebook is dead If I return to the title of this article, Facebook is dead, this gives 222 million results in Google. 1.91 billion for Facebook is dead !!! Certainly these figures do not correspond to exact expressions (with ““; for example “facebook is dead”) but it gives an idea of the number of articles which address the subject, directly or indirectly.
So proposing a title and an illustrative image that will stand out or even attract people Email Data is not a putaclic... if the content is of quality. The shock of content We must not lie to ourselves: the gap is enormous and becomes abysmal between the quantity of content produced and the quantity of content consumed. Many contributors are read only by themselves. This is quite striking when you look closely at the page view stats of many websites. Sometimes there are fewer readers in 1 year than there are people on the team. But often this doesn't bother anyone. It is therefore necessary, if not vital, to use titles or even illustrations that provoke or at least challenge. If we want to be spotted and therefore read, we have no choice. Trying to keep the promise For my part, I try to combine shocking titles.
I don't care, I have a big one ) and quality content, that is to say thoughtful and argued. I can have fairly clear-cut positions. These are more convictions than certainties. I don't know if I'm right. But, all my points of view are considered and argued. I try to avoid shock formulas and without any attempt at demonstration. This also applies to my comments: I try just as much to avoid “that’s bad” as I do “great!”. So: Facebook is dead If I return to the title of this article, Facebook is dead, this gives 222 million results in Google. 1.91 billion for Facebook is dead !!! Certainly these figures do not correspond to exact expressions (with ““; for example “facebook is dead”) but it gives an idea of the number of articles which address the subject, directly or indirectly.
